How the Child Broke the Mob


(Image taken from The Daily Beast)

How the Child Broke the Mob

To Kill a Mockingbird, written in 1960 by Harper Lee, is considered an American classic by many. The Pulitzer Prizewinning novel is taught in schools across the country, as it addresses important issues such as racial injustices, the destruction of innocence, class, courage, compassion, tolerance, gender roles, and many other topics. The novel takes place in the American south in the 1930s and details a summer in the life of Atticus Finch, as told by his six year old daughter Scout. Atticus, a lawyer, is assigned a case in which he is to defend Tom Robinson, a black man who is accused of raping a young white woman.
There are many scenes in the story that are relevant to social psychology, but there is one scene in particular that I have always found to be fascinating. In chapter fifteen of the novel, when Atticus leaves the house one night, Scout, her brother Jem, and their friend Dill, head out in search of him. When they find him sitting outside of the local jail, reading the newspaper in the dim light, they start to head home. But just as they begin to leave, a string of cars pull up and come to a stop in front of the jail, and it’s revealed to the children hiding in the darkness, that the townsmen have come in search of Tom Robinson. When Scout realizes this could mean trouble, she dashes up the street, through the men, and into the light to join Atticus, with Jem and Dill not far behind. After the children refuse Atticus’s instructions to leave and go straight home, one of the men grab Jem by the collar, and after a physical altercation with the men, Scout looks around at the mob for a face that she recognizes.
She’s able to find one in Mr. Cunningham, whom she addresses but gets no response from. Trying to make friendly conversation, Scout introduces herself to Mr. Cunningham, and reminds him of a past interaction. “‘Don’t you remember me, Mr. Cunningham? I’m Jean Louise Finch. You brought us some hickory nuts one time, remember?”’ When this fails, she informs him that she goes to school with his boy, Walter. “I began to sense the futility one feels when unacknowledged by a chance acquaintance. ‘I go to school with Walter,’ I began again. ‘He’s your boy, ain’t he? Ain’t he, sir?’”
After some probing by Scout, Mr. Cunningham reluctantly nods, but still says nothing, so she keeps at it. “‘He’s in my grade,’ I said, ‘and he does right well. He’s a good boy,’ I added, ‘a real nice boy. We brought him home for dinner one time. Maybe he told you about me, I beat him up one time but he was real nice about it. Tell him hey for me, won’t you?’” Scout continues to try to make polite conversation, before noticing that everyone is watching her. “I slowly awoke to the fact that I was addressing the entire aggregation,” she observes. “The men were all looking at me, some had their mouths half-open. Atticus had stopped poking at Jem: they were standing together beside Dill. Their attention amounted to fascination. Atticus’s mouth, even, was half-open, an attitude he had once described as uncouth. Our eyes met and he shut it.”
Not one to be the center of attention, and not realizing why she is currently, Scout begins to stress. “I began to feel sweat gathering at the edges of my hair; I could stand anything but a bunch of people looking at me. They were quite still.” But eventually, the silence is broken. “I looked around and up at Mr. Cunningham, whose face was equally impassive. Then he did a peculiar thing. He squatted down and took me by both shoulders. ‘I’ll tell him you said hey, little lady,’ he said. Then he straightened up and waved a big paw. ‘Let’s clear out,’ he called. ‘Let’s get going, boys.’” And as quickly and as solemnly as they had come, the men turned around and leave.
The film adaptation of the novel, made in 1962, does a great job of presenting this scene, but there’s just something about the way that Lee describes it in the novel. The way that Scout so effectively, albeit unintentionally, is able to break down the mob mentality and restore an individual identity to one man. And this scene, although fictional, provides a great example of how deindividuation not only happens, but also how it can be broken down.
It’s so easy for members of a physical group such as a mob to lose themselves to it, to become deindividualized and lose all sense of accountability. In the dark of the night, the men in the mob were able to follow the crowd with the intention of doing harm, and it wasn’t until someone pointed out the individual humanity, that the individual identity was restored. Similarly, it’s easy for members of mobs to dress in white robes and masks as the Klu Klux Klan has, or in black clothes and masks as members of ANTIFA have. It’s easy to blend in, to disassociate with who you are outside of the mob, and to take action without fear of being held accountable, and this is particularly true and dangerous when the mob has bad intentions. We know that this happens, and we know through this history or mobs in this country, that this can lead us into dangerous territory. The question we’re left with then is, how do we, on the side of civility, play the role of Scout Finch, and restore individual identity to members of a mob before the real damage is done.

(Image on left taken from Huffington Post. Image on right taken from The Mercury News.)




References:

Donley, M. (2011). Examining the Mob Mentality. Retrieved from http://source.southuniversity.edu/examining-the-mob-mentality-31395.aspx
Kassin, Fein & Markus (2017). Social Psychology, 10th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Lee, H. (1960). To Kill A Mockingbird. McIntosh and Otis.
Mulligan, R. (Director). (1962). To Kill A Mockingbird [Motion picture]. Universal.


Comments

  1. I enjoyed reading this book in high school an analyzing it through a racial lens, but I never really thought about what Scout was really doing in that scene. The way you describe deindividualization sounds like how people cyber bully anonymously. It really does provide a sense of power and confidence to the individual. The question I have for you is why do you think the rest of the men left too if only Cunningham was deindividualized?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with what you said about cyber bullying. Similar to wearing a mask, when you know that those you're interacting with cannot identify you, you're more likely to say and do things that you wouldn't want connected back to you personally.

      I response to your questions as to why the other men left, that's interesting to think about. I think that maybe in Scout drawing the humanity back into Mr. Cunningham, the other men were able to see the humanity in themselves as well. This may have forced a sense of shame or guilt when they realized that, like Mr. Cunningham, they are all individually responsible people.

      Delete
  2. What a great topic! Your post was very interesting for me to read because when I originally read this book for school, I was too young to be considering the psychological factors that played a role in what unfolds. I think it is very interesting to think about how innately good children can be in situations like this. Though this novel is fiction, I don’t think that it is completely unlikely that a child could garner attention in the way that Scout did. I think that in general, kids are very good at being resilient when they want attention from someone older and will often try to talk to them about things that they have in common. I wonder if these kinds of practices are something that children develop or if it just happens naturally because they don’t understand social contexts and when they are not “supposed” to be getting involved or bringing up certain topics. For example, I don’t know that I would have immediately thought to talk about personal topics with Mr. Cunningham. On first instinct I probably would have tried to reason with him about what they were doing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's an interesting thought! I agree with children being innately good, but I think that Scout represents something much deeper that just that. The character of her father Atticus has been held up as somewhat of an American hero and character of moral good since the publishing of this book, and I think that how Atticus raises Scout and her brother Jem play a large part in that. Much of Scout's character isn't simply in her innocence of youth, but in her coming-of-age and maturing through the guidance of her father. Although I didn't include it in my analysis of the scene, Scout, in narrating this moment, does talk about how things that her father had taught her influence her behavior and how she reacts. That would be another interesting way to analyze this scene, looking at it from how certain people would react based on their age or how they've been taught to deal with conflict!

      Delete
  3. It's really fascinating to read about this topic from the perspective of To Kill a Mockingbird. It's a powerful book, and it's heartening to hear how there is, in theory at least, a process to break the mob mentality. I wonder if the way to break down the hatred some people feel and the need they feel to group together and cause violence is truly just to remind them of the people they are, and the lives that they lead. Scout caused Mr. Cunningham to break free from the hold mob, and become the voice of reason for the rest of his fellows to stop their foolishness.
    I do have a question for you, do you think that if something like this could happen today at some of the large protests and rallies that often beget violence? Or do you think that we would need to combat the underlying fears and angers of the people protesting first?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You pose an interesting question, and that's something that I've been thinking about since writing this post. Scout is able to break down the mob, but the mob had not yet gotten to the point of chaos and violence, and the mob was also relatively small. A lot of the mobs that we see in today's society are much larger, and are quicker to turn to violence (especially when they put on masks, and it seems as though violence and chaos is their intent.) I'm not sure then, if the method that Scout uses is one that would work in that case.

      But regardless of whether or not reminding the mob of their individual humanity will calm them, I think there is a lot to be gained in addressing the underlying fears and angers of the protesters or mob, and it may be the most vital step. In the case in To Kill A Mockingbird, yeah, the mob was able to be tamed, but that does little in addressing the problem of the racism of the townsmen. Calming the mob and reducing the violence is great for the time being, but it does little to stop it from occurring again.

      Delete
  4. To Kill A Mockingbird was one of my favorite books I read in high school. Just like Rachel, I had never really thought about what Scout did in that scene. I have definitely been in situations before where the ‘mob mentality’ takes over and I’ve found myself saying or doing things I wouldn’t normally do. I think we tend to forget parts of our individuality when we are part of a group, especially in situations/groups led by anger. Anger is one of those emotions that really takes over everything in the moment. It would be interesting to study the differences in emotion and group processes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I definitely don't think you're alone in that, I think many of us have found ourselves doing things and then thinking afterwards in a moment of shame that "I can't believe I acted that way." The moments when I've been in that situation, or at least the ones that come to mind, are also, in large part, moments of group anger, and it seems to me that that's the common trend. I agree, it would be really interesting to look into how group processes take over depending on the group emotion!

      Delete
  5. This is a very interesting idea. The notion that a group under the influence of mob mentality can be broken down by one person individualizing them seems like a great concept. It would be interesting to try to find real world examples of this type of action. Stopping mobs and riots now is always done with more violence (police, army, etc.). While this can effectively stop a mob with enough force, it tends to solidify their belief in the cause that they are fighting for, instead of bringing about contemplation and conversation to find middle ground. If there was a way to implement this kind of strategy on the types of mobs we see today, it would certainly be worth looking into.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I agree in large part with most violent mobs being stopped with opposing violence. While Scout's method of fighting deindividualization works great in her case and in theory, there don't seem to be many cases in modern society where this would work. It think that it could potentially work in cases where the mob has yet to turn to violence, cases where there is a respected voice of authority that is able to "talk sense" into the mob, or cases where the side of reason or peace is larger than that of chaos or violence, but other than that, I'm not so sure. The best response might be what I addressed in Justin's comment; addressing the underlying fears and angers of the protesters or mob.

      Delete
  6. Great post! I really appreciated this as a topic, as it brought back some great nostalgia of reading this book. I remember enjoying it immensely, albeit I have forgotten many of the details, and I think this post has encouraged me to go back through some of the older "classic" novels that I was assigned throughout high school with the knowledge I have now and see how much more information I can pull from the book and analyze. I definitely forgot about this scene, but re-reading it, I don't think I'll be able to forget it, it is definitely very powerful, as well as an excellent example of how deindividuation can be broken down, and portrays a unique (although brief) example of how humanity can prevail against animosity, hatred, and discrimination (Although it is unfortunate that the entire tale of the book does not have the heart warming ending, although it certainly is much more grounding and eye-opening because of it).

    I like how you dissected this as being a way to break down deindividuation, and it certainly appears to be effective, I would be interested in seeing other ways in which this principle is broken down. It seems as though if you can bring the personality back into one person in a public fashion, it may be enough to get others in the group to start thinking of themselves as individuals again as well. Great dissection, and thanks for reintroducing me to an excellent read!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's one of the great things about a lot of the classic novels, they can be read so many times, from so many different perspectives, and still be interesting every time!

      In response to your comment about other ways in which the principle of deindividuation is broken down, there's was an interesting story in the news a few years ago that just came to mind, where a woman who was taken hostage was able to convince her captor to surrender and let her free by asking him about his family and telling him about her own. By reminding the captor that both of them were individuals with pasts and potential futures, she was able to remind him of their individual humanity. According to a quick Google search, there have been numerous cases throughout the years where something similar to this has happened, and it's interesting to think about!

      Delete
  7. Your blog was incredibly interesting to read! I remember reading this book in high school and it never occurred to me the various effects the book has on readers. Not only does it focus on social issues, but it also focuses on psychological issues as a result.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's one of the reasons why I love going back and rereading books after a few years. Depending on your life circumstances, or just the lens that you're reading the book through, you're able to see different aspects to the story that you may not have noticed previously!

      Delete
  8. You just made me realize how much I actually liked this book! It has been quite a while since I read it (I think i last read it in 9th grade for English class), so some of the specifics have faded feom my memory, but I remember exactly the feelings that some scenes left me with. Your example is definitely a very powerful scene. Its amazing that people who may once have interacted and were amicable can get so caught up in mob mentality and in the heat of the moment that they are capable of such terrible things. The way an innocent child is able to diffuse the situation by calling a person out on commonalities is also intriguing. I wonder if this strategy can be put to use in other social contexts or in real life mob mentality situations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you, that it is rather amazing to see people get caught up in the mob mentality and turn to acts that they may not otherwise. When you're on the outside, you can watch in incredulously, but when you're on the inside, you don't really realize that it's happening.

      As for the strategy being put to use in other social contexts, I provided an example in response to Ben's comment that may fit!

      Delete
  9. Excellent topic; I think mob mentality is a really pressing issue, especially with the increased anonymity afforded by the Internet.
    To address your call to action at the end, the most straightforward solution is to prevent mobs from forming in the first place. Of course, as long as we live in a free society, this is very difficult to do without infringing upon civil liberties. Re-individualizing people is also quite difficult. However, I think that through education we can have an impact on the issue. Perhaps by making people more aware of the process of deindividualization, they can understand what's happening to them when their in a crowd, and stop themselves from getting deindividualized in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Educating people on deindividuation is an interesting thought, and I do think that that it could help in some circumstances, such as when peaceful protests turn chaotic. It would help for members of a group to be able to remember their identity and remind those around them of their own. However, in cases where protesters or rioters set out in masks or disguises, I think that education of deindividuation would do very little, because the members of the mob are intentionally separating themselves from their identity. Relating it back to the To Kill A Mockingbird example, if Mr. Cunningham knew about deindividuation, he may have simply worn a mask so that Scout wouldn't have been able to force him to think about his identity. Thanks for your comment, it's an interesting thing to think about!

      Delete
  10. This makes me wish I had read the book. Almost everyone has heard of it, but I feel compared to that few have actually read it. That could be a bias statement based off my own interactions with people though. This post makes you think. I didn't read through the comments but you may have stumbled on to a good way to start breaking up the hate. That is instead of famous people delivering messages on TV and everything else, have children do it. When a child says something funny we usually laugh a bit harder than if an adult said it. When a child says something meaningful and heartfelt it's hard not to listen and be touched by it. I'm not saying it's that simple, just could be one part of an overall strategy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In response to your final question, It's interesting to think about what would have happened if Scout never showed up or called out Mr. Cunningham. Would Atticus be enough to deindividualize the mob and make them really think and act accountable for their actions? What does it take to snap someone out of the crowd mentality?

      Delete
  11. To Kill a Mockingbird was one of the few books I enjoyed reading in school. The scene you presented perfectly depicts how being in both a mob and anonymous can lead you to do things that you would normally not do or are frowned upon by society. As shown in the scene, even calling out member of a group can make the everyone uncomfortable and stop what they are doing. Do you think this method, calling out individuals, can lead to the stopping of some of the issues we are having today with large groups who start off with protests and, because of the size of the group and the factor of anonymity, start riots?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I found this to be particularly interesting because I remember being struck by this scene when I first read the book. Back then I did not know much about how group dynamics worked. Now, though, I am glad you made the connection of breaking the mob with reintroducing the individuality of the mob members. I would be curious to see if this technique could be effective today in some of the mob or riot situations that occur.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment